4 ms·
I'm not sure. I'm tempted to say I'm about as productive (in orders of magnitude) in any language that I'm very familiar with and has a large enough "batteries
by gcp 10y ago
I'm not sure. I'm tempted to say I'm about as productive (in orders of magnitude) in any language that I'm very familiar with and has a large enough "batteries included" component (yes, crates would count, as does npm). Even C++ as long as the extras from boost are there.
I can type reasonably correct code much faster than I can reason about how the program should work.
- jamwt 10y agoI'm not saying unproductive. I'm saying, we need to be realistic. Compared to, say, Python, it's nowhere close. Compared to C++, Java, or even Go, it's anywhere from competitive to significantly better.
- flukus 10y agoYou may be using a different definition of productive. I wouldn't consider python or any dynamic language productive on a large project.