Am I the only one seeing the fallacious reasoning in these statements? In each case, it's the researcher that asks the question. They use a computer to calcula

Am I the only one seeing the fallacious reasoning in these statements? In each case, it's the researcher that asks the question. They use a computer to calculate an answer, but the next question doesn't jump out of the computer -- it comes from the researcher's mind once they see the results from the computer. They're strictly answer calculating machines. Not question generating machines. I would like to see a computer pose an interesting, non-trival question about physics, mathematics, cosmology, logic, etc. Something that would be accepted as a master's or PhD thesis.