3 ms·

You're probably right there. And there's presumably shortages and surpluses in different regions of the US. A telling statistic is the amount of people who grad

by anjc 10y ago

You're probably right there. And there's presumably shortages and surpluses in different regions of the US. A telling statistic is the amount of people who graduate with IT or STEM degrees, have intentions of working in their respective industries, but have to leave due to an inability to get work, or...unemployment rates for graduates with certain degrees. It was about 7-12% a couple of years ago for grads from CS, Engineering, and IS, at a time when the national level was lower. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/03/the-myth-of-the-science-and-engineering-shortage/284359/ https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/03/the-my... I'm not sure if we're on the same page, but my contention is that western governments are encouraging kids to pursue STEM, knowing that there's already an oversupply of workers due to visas issued to emerging economies, and that the issue is compounding year on year.

Bartweiss 10y ago
Wow. That's a decently narrow standard, and I had no idea it was so high. I object to some specifics - IS without programming education is quite different from CS/programming - but it's still a potent statistic. More narrowly, my (cynical) take is that CS degrees are decidedly unequal. Having seen multiple companies say they only bother with top-seven job fairs, and some genuinely talented friends struggle to land interviews with third-string universities on their resumes, I get the sense that the "shortage" and "surplus" are capable of existing side-by-side. I completely agree with your conclusion, since it holds regardless of whether I'm right about segmentation within CS degrees: a lot of people are being unhelpfully pushed into "employable" STEM degrees by people who want to look science-friendly, and they're going to be left holding the (unemployment) bag when that doesn't work out.
- anjc 10y ago
  There's definitely a wide variation in teaching between ostensibly similar courses, which might make some of the simple stats nonsensical. > I get the sense that the "shortage" and "surplus" are capable of existing side-by-side. I guess this is fundamentally the issue

by anjc 10y ago

Bartweiss 10y ago

Wow. That's a decently narrow standard, and I had no idea it was so high. I object to some specifics - IS without programming education is quite different from CS/programming - but it's still a potent statistic. More narrowly, my (cynical) take is that CS degrees are decidedly unequal. Having seen multiple companies say they only bother with top-seven job fairs, and some genuinely talented friends struggle to land interviews with third-string universities on their resumes, I get the sense that the "shortage" and "surplus" are capable of existing side-by-side. I completely agree with your conclusion, since it holds regardless of whether I'm right about segmentation within CS degrees: a lot of people are being unhelpfully pushed into "employable" STEM degrees by people who want to look science-friendly, and they're going to be left holding the (unemployment) bag when that doesn't work out.

anjc 10y ago
There's definitely a wide variation in teaching between ostensibly similar courses, which might make some of the simple stats nonsensical. > I get the sense that the "shortage" and "surplus" are capable of existing side-by-side. I guess this is fundamentally the issue