5 ms·
The "work" in this case would be the modified AGPL service. Using a reverse proxy, the "end user" would be the person running the reverse proxy, so you would ow
by mnutt 10y ago
The "work" in this case would be the modified AGPL service. Using a reverse proxy, the "end user" would be the person running the reverse proxy, so you would owe source modification code to yourself, but nobody else.
- zerocrates 10y agoThere's a possibility that courts would interpret the remote interaction clause very narrowly as you suggest, allowing people to sidestep the teeth of the license easily. I think that possibility is fairly small, but you never know for sure of course. Still, my main point was that the route taken by Mongo is intended to remove this kind of uncertainty: normal applications using it don't modify or include any AGPL code, so the question of just how far "remote interaction" goes never comes up.