The way I originally meant the "unavoidable", (in response to a comment that there's unsafe code in the Rust compiler), is that in some cases, you'll always nee

The way I originally meant the "unavoidable", (in response to a comment that there's unsafe code in the Rust compiler), is that in some cases, you'll always need unsafe, since some operations are inherently unsafe, (like writing bytes directly to hardware). This due to the nature of computers, the lower level the code gets, the more likely it is that some unsafe will be needed, not because of any fault of Rust, but because of the nature of computer hardware. Therefore I meant it as in; since a compiler is relatively low-level project, some unsafe code is (most likely) unavoidable, due to the task at hand. The other poster seemed to take the unavoidable comment to mean something wider than what I was talking about.