4 ms·
given that site is static content, it's more than easy to use something like cloudflare, which afaik even on their free plan will cache it on their global cdn.
by outlog 10y ago
given that site is static content, it's more than easy to use something like cloudflare, which afaik even on their free plan will cache it on their global cdn.
(honestly I would consider the possibility of the "crashing" being part of a PR strategy - makes a good story)
- YPCrumble 10y agoThe free tier of cloudflare includes global cdn. Does that mean all they would have had to do is use the free tier and they would have avoided the issue? Would there have been some kind of cloudflare loading screen if they'd done that? It doesn't make sense that you can do that with cloudflare for free.