3 ms·

> Isn't that the anti definition of net neutrality? Yes, zero-rating is a direct affront to net neutrality: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/02/zero-rating-w

> Isn't that the anti definition of net neutrality? Yes, zero-rating is a direct affront to net neutrality: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/02/zero-rating-what-it-is-why-you-should-care https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/02/zero-rating-what-it-is... But I don't think that we're going to see many successes in net neutrality at the federal level anytime soon - the fight really has to be carried out at the state level.

gcb0 10y ago
...and still absolutely nobody think about moving companies. We already have number portability.
- criley2 10y ago
  ...Moving companies? Tmobile, Verizon, AT&T and Sprint uses 0 rating. That's the entirety of the American wireless infrastructure. It is literally impossible to use 4g wireless communication in America without patronizing directly or indirectly a 0 rating neutrality violator.
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]