3 ms·
Why not? You make the claim that nothing important should be done in JS, but why not? You established your opinion, then gave the evidence to support it, rath
by jmcdiesel 10y ago
Why not? You make the claim that nothing important should be done in JS, but why not? You established your opinion, then gave the evidence to support it, rather than the other way around. I'm curious to the actual reason you find that JS should be avoided, and what, specifically, the other languages give to the solution that JS is lacking in.
- true_religion 10y agoThis isn't science, this is the proof standard of detective work or politics. Rhetoric first then proof to convince the audience.