3 ms·
> I have spoken to too many Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, or Google employees that are convinced that sharing their source code would be tantamount to death. The
by gregmac 10y ago
> I have spoken to too many Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, or Google employees that are convinced that sharing their source code would be tantamount to death. The result is a world where their secret software controls the news we read, the ads we see, the people we talk to, and even the emotions we feel.
Can you make a counter-argument to this? Let's even just focus on Facebook and Google core's core offerings: What benefit would Google get from open sourcing their indexer, ranking algorithms, and core search software? What benefit would Facebook get from doing the same with their ad-matching and timeline/recommendation software?
- appleflaxen 10y agoS/he is NOT claiming that "open source is always good", which is the straw man you are trying to knock down. claim: "source code is [not necessarily] tantamount to death" you provide several counterexamples where (it seems) you think it would be tantamount to death. But regardless of your number of examples, there only needs to be one case where it's not tantamount to death for the author's point to be valid.