It wasn't a speech about technology, it was an offhand comment during a speech to students at Hampton University, which the Economist then chose to center an ar

It wasn't a speech about technology, it was an offhand comment during a speech to students at Hampton University, which the Economist then chose to center an article around. The comment itself had a kernel of truth but if you expand it to a 4-graf article then yes it turns out not to do the situation full justice. Stop the presses :)