3 ms·
If the cameras are above the screen, and the subject is far enough, the eye's angle doesn't matter much.
by erelde 10y ago
If the cameras are above the screen, and the subject is far enough, the eye's angle doesn't matter much.
- metafunctor 10y agoWhy do you say that? It's quite easy to see that the person on the other end isn't making eye contact, even when they think they are, looking straight in your eyes. To me, it seems like they are looking at my tits or something. It matters quite a lot. Also, FPS and resolution. There's a long, long way to go before video conferencing feels more like an actual face-to-face conversation, and it hasn't really changed much in the past 10 years. I mean, the main complaint against remote work seems to be that there's still no substitute for an actual face-to-face conversation. That IS a tech problem that CAN be solved with tech. The current tech is woefully inadequate.
- erelde 10y agoI say that because: depending on those factors (and some others like lense type, focus etc) the difference between the angle eye/screen and eye/camera is insignificant... You just have to draw a schema to understand. 3 to 5 meters is a good distance for a video conference.
- metafunctor 10y agoIt's not insignificant. Humans are pretty good in determining whether someone is making eye contact or not. At 5 meters, we can easily detect a 10cm deviation in gaze direction [1]. Also, I'd like to be (or feel like I am) much closer than 5 meters when talking with someone. [1] http://tachilab.org/content/files/publication/tp/imai200604Presence.pdf http://tachilab.org/content/files/publication/tp/imai200604P...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- btmorex 10y agoInteresting that you think it's insignificant. A lot of group photos are taken at 3 to 5 meters away and it's immediately obvious who's looking directly into the camera and who isn't...