I don't think you should conflate diversity of opinions with allowing incitement to murder or violence. Come on: plenty of countries have anti-incitement legis

I don't think you should conflate diversity of opinions with allowing incitement to murder or violence. Come on: plenty of countries have anti-incitement legislation, so it's not impossible to draw a distinction between having an idea and trying to kill someone. Personally, I'm with the poster above. The kinds of people now billing themselves as (let's quote him) a "Dangerous Faggot" are promoting an ideology of hatred and extermination. You are welcome to read their books and their websites: that's what's there. They want a war to separate the pure from the unclean, and having lost branches off my family tree in the Holocaust, I don't want them spreading their ideology while also holding state power. We've all seen the Blues Brothers scene about the neo-Nazi parade, and we all know that our society tolerates even those horrifyingly murderous differences of opinion. However, when you're the ally of a sitting government, the standard really should be higher. I held controversial events and helped bring in controversial speakers when I was in undergrad. I worked with the College Republicans, God help me, on some of those. People staged walk-outs and protests about events I helped to put on. However, I wasn't anything like a neo-Nazi, and I was not paid to be a fellow-traveler of the sitting government at the time.