2 ms·
"VB for web apps" is a fair summary. We made a conscious decision against anything AST-based (for the reasons I outlined above), and we're about to deploy an In
by meredydd 10y ago
"VB for web apps" is a fair summary. We made a conscious decision against anything AST-based (for the reasons I outlined above), and we're about to deploy an Intellisense-style autocompleter instead. Our general philosophy is that coding is fine - it's the web/Javascript ecosystem that's the problem. We fix that, then get out of the way and let you write code :)
As for validating one's side projects before starting work - I personally think the Lean Startup thing can be taken a bit far. An interesting leisure-time technical project doesn't need the same level of prior justification as a big commercial project (even if it might one day evolve into one), as long as you're having fun. We do this stuff because we enjoy it!
- westoncb 10y ago> it's the web/Javascript ecosystem that's the problem. I agree—that's definitely the bigger issue. I think differences between editors and languages tend to be overblown in general. Unfortunately the project for me was not quite a fun thing: I ran into an issue with mouse/keyboard overuse, so I was trying to build an editor that could work efficiently with motion sensors. In the meantime, coding was painful :/ I'm still looking for an alternative for that reason—but VR and mobile also have needs for efficient editors that can be operated with fewer unique symbols. Also, another solution to the AST editor issue: just convert any non-parsing nodes into plain text nodes until they're fixed.