Nitpick >Something cannot be "useless" and have a use. Even if a thing has one single use, it is not and cannot be called, "useless". Thats not true; if its o

Nitpick >Something cannot be "useless" and have a use. Even if a thing has one single use, it is not and cannot be called, "useless". Thats not true; if its only uses are themselves "useless", then the object is also useless. To be not useless, it implies useful, in which case its use has value. Not that it has some use whatsoever (since anything can be given a use, the term useless would have no meaning)