3 ms·
I agree with your points. My comment was based on my personal experience as a radio amateur. When I was young, when Morse was still central to radio communicati
by lutusp 10y ago
I agree with your points. My comment was based on my personal experience as a radio amateur. When I was young, when Morse was still central to radio communications, I spent too much time learning how to send and far too little learning how to receive, such that my receiving speed is now still far below my ability to send.
> Second, effort spent on sending practice helps reinforce receiving practice.
Perhaps to some extent, but I find that I can send with much more adeptness that the reverse. This (or its reverse) may be a common experience. I think time should be devoted to both, so I think we're in essential agreement.
> It's a hobby and should be fun!
Complete agreement, and how times change. After the Titanic went down, nautical authorities promptly required that radiotelegraph sets be installed on all large ocean-going vessels. Now Morse is a diversion, an interesting historical artifact.