3 ms·
You said: "A is the definition of B" I said: "Here are some Bs that are not A" If you had said the definition of a kangaroo was "a big marsupial from Australi
by xiaoma 10y ago
You said:
"A is the definition of B"
I said:
"Here are some Bs that are not A"
If you had said the definition of a kangaroo was "a big marsupial from Australia" and I pointed out many kangroos that weren't actually big marsupials from Australia, It would suggest that the definition was flawed.
- mdpopescu 10y ago> You said: "A is the definition of B" > I said: "Here are some Bs that are not A" Yes, and I pointed out that the two are unrelated. > If you had said the definition of a kangaroo was "a big marsupial from Australia" and I pointed out many kangroos that weren't actually big marsupials from Australia, It would suggest that the definition was flawed. If I had said that the definition of an A (kangaroo) is a B (big marsupial), and you pointed out that many As (kangaroos) aren't Bs (big marsupials), I would have been proven wrong. However, I said A (companies making a billion dollars in revenue) implies B (they benefit a lot of people) and you pointed out some Bs (companies benefiting everyone) that aren't As (companies making a billion dollars in revenue), which is irrelevant. This is basic logic, I learned it in fifth grade. A => B is not a commutative operation.