3 ms·
It's not about the problem being solved, Winamp was fast, minimal and beautiful. I miss it.
by cdelsolar 10y ago
It's not about the problem being solved, Winamp was fast, minimal and beautiful. I miss it.
- T-hawk 10y agoWhy not just use a fast, minimal, and beautiful old version of Winamp? It still exists. I've been running v2.95 since 2003.