4 ms·
I agree the ideas are interesting, but I wonder how easy it is to detect that the house is empty (and who has the burden of proof). Unless there are some pretty
by ptero 10y ago
I agree the ideas are interesting, but I wonder how easy it is to detect that the house is empty (and who has the burden of proof). Unless there are some pretty draconian / invasive inspections I wonder if the law has any teeth. Not a criticism of the root comment, just curious.
- awqrre 10y agoLooking at the power consumption should be enough in most cases unless they generate their own electricity which should also be easy to figure out... from my home I can wirelessly read the power meters of about 30 of my neighbors (updated every 1 to 5 minutes) using a cheap rtl-sdr and a raspberry-pi (I probably could do better if I placed the antenna outside of my house or if I optimized the antenna for the frequency)
- MarkMc 10y agoThen I can avoid the tax by using a timer device to switch the lights on and off
- branchless 10y agoStop dancing on the head of a pin! Land value tax. No income tax. People who add no value get nothing.
- krrrh 10y agoOr a land value surtax which you don't have to pay if you are already paying income taxes or retired. http://www.macleans.ca/economy/economicanalysis/a-roadmap-for-bringing-sanity-back-to-housing-markets/ http://www.macleans.ca/economy/economicanalysis/a-roadmap-fo...