4 ms·
This case is with the Ninth Circuit on appeal. If you are interested in how courts conduct oral arguments in cases like this, there is a video recording availab
by macmac 10y ago
This case is with the Ninth Circuit on appeal. If you are interested in how courts conduct oral arguments in cases like this, there is a video recording available at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/view_video.php?pk_vid=0000010345 http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/view_video.php?pk_vid=0000...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- icebraining 10y agoI like how they really grill the lawyer of the plaintiff. Frankly, her explanations - especially when trying to come up with a test to distinguish their software from Photoshop - are pitiful.
- macmac 10y agoIt gets slightly better later when she explains how some of the elements of the output is controlled by the CAD software, but it is still a very weak argument.
- icebraining 10y agoThat still doesn't distinguish it from PS, though; just look at Content-Aware Fill.
- macmac 10y agoAs I mentioned, weak argument.
- a_humean 10y agoThe defendant seems pretty scummy and deserving to be held accountable, but the plaintiff's strategy seems dead in the water. Judges are giving both a very good grilling.
- icebraining 10y ago> Judges are giving both a very good grilling. On that note, the Ninth District YouTube account is pretty interesting if you're into legal arguments. I particularly enjoy the hearings with Judge Kozinski.