4 ms·
Have you considered that women are just not interested in chess, or are generally worse at it than men, so they rage-quit? Hou Yifan, "The Queen of Chess" is r
by imaginenore 10y ago
Have you considered that women are just not interested in chess, or are generally worse at it than men, so they rage-quit?
Hou Yifan, "The Queen of Chess" is ranked #1 among women has a FIDE rating of 2651, which places her below 100th place among men.
https://ratings.fide.com/top.phtml?list=women https://ratings.fide.com/top.phtml?list=women
https://ratings.fide.com/top.phtml?list=men https://ratings.fide.com/top.phtml?list=men
That distribution is actually normal, considering how many more men play chess than women. But I haven't heard a good explanation on why so few women play chess in the first place (other than the two reasons I suggested).
https://phys.org/news/2009-01-men-higher-women-chess-biological.html https://phys.org/news/2009-01-men-higher-women-chess-biologi...
- _yosefk 10y agoThe father of the 3 Polgar sisters deliberately pushed them to play chess to prove a point. All 3 got very good, Judith was #10 in the world. This strongly suggests "not interested" is more true of other women than "not that good."
- pervycreeper 10y ago>This strongly suggests Do you mean that that single example constitutes strong evidence of your claim, or merely that it seems to support an opinion which is strongly held?
- _yosefk 10y agoActually it's a 3 in one example, and the strongest of the 3 players is the strongest woman chess player ever. So I guess that yes, I think it's pretty strong evidence, and no, I don't hold this opinion particularly strongly; I don't really give a shit which group is better at what but it's always fun to watch people foaming at their mouths trying to prove how similar or different groups are when it's obviously false.
- dogecoinbase 10y agoTruly a compelling statement from "pervycreeper".