4 ms·
CONIKS – Bringing Key Transparency to End Users (2014) [pdf]
- CaliforniaKarl 10y agoJoseph Bonneau, one of the paper's authors, talked about this in the Stanford Computer (course EE380) during Autumn quarter. The talk's abstract: http://ee380.stanford.edu/Abstracts/161130.html http://ee380.stanford.edu/Abstracts/161130.html A video: http://ee380.stanford.edu/Abstracts/161130-video.html http://ee380.stanford.edu/Abstracts/161130-video.html One thing I didn't understand, is that CONIKS is not something where clients can insert keys in an unrestricted manner: There is a gatekeeper (run by the service provider), who does some sort of testing/control before inserting a new key.
- baby 10y agothe video doesn't work for me. HN hug? EDIT: I think it opens up as a pop up to here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ca0BHUNoTF0&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ca0BHUNoTF0&feature=youtu.be EDIT2: CONIKS starts at around 40 minutes https://youtu.be/Ca0BHUNoTF0?t=2379 https://youtu.be/Ca0BHUNoTF0?t=2379
- ghughes 10y agoGoogle's Key Transparency project [1] is based on this. [1] https://security.googleblog.com/2017/01/security-through-transparency.html?m=1 https://security.googleblog.com/2017/01/security-through-tra...
- baby 10y agoI came here to say that. Anyone knows how relevant is CONIKS now that Key Transparency is out? Kind of like, how relevant is NTS now that Roughtime is out?