3 ms·
That's collusion and it's not cool. No top pro would ever seriously ask to 'check it down' Kelly's criterion and the sharpe ratio is not relevant for the forma
by 6nf 10y ago
That's collusion and it's not cool. No top pro would ever seriously ask to 'check it down'
Kelly's criterion and the sharpe ratio is not relevant for the format played in these human-AI heads up games. They play with an unlimited bankroll.
- xapata 10y agoI'm not talking about a tournament. And yes, it could indicate collusion. But most of the time, it's just a friendly low- or mid-stakes game and the players are tired of thinking. My point exactly about the unlimited bankroll. The experimenters may not have realized that an unlimited bankroll would significantly affect the strategy.