3 ms·
They said it's not seizure, they didn't say it's theft. Argument for piracy has been that it's not depriving the original owner of the content, but that has b
by segmondy 10y ago
They said it's not seizure, they didn't say it's theft. Argument for piracy has been that it's not depriving the original owner of the content, but that has been argued against. So I'm not sure your argument will hold.
- TazeTSchnitzel 10y agoYes, the crime is copyright infringement, not theft, even if movie studios like to spin the former as a form of the latter.
- ezoe 10y agoSurely, the content of almost all emails express human philosophy enough to be accounted the copyright.
- kahnpro 10y agoIt's not a crime. Stop calling it that. Copyright infringement is a civil offence. You get sued by a movie studio for money, not prosecuted by the state and imprisoned. But the industry is working to change that...
- TazeTSchnitzel 10y agoFair point, though it depends on your jurisdiction.
- manquer 10y agoThere is another interesting question .Who owns the emails ? Google ? Account holder ?.. can the account holder claim IP infringement ?
- manquer 10y agoThere is another interesting question .Who owns the emails ? Google ? Account holder ?.. can the account holder claim IP infringement ?