> Or do you mean "Upon being sued, most peoples immediate reaction would be to search the web about how to destroy evidence"? That one, but not exactly. It's

> Or do you mean "Upon being sued, most peoples immediate reaction would be to search the web about how to destroy evidence"? That one, but not exactly. It's not just about destroying evidence, but about destroying unrelated stuff such as the porn collection or downloaded movies. Or that "non-commercial" shareware you installed but did not bother to pay just yet. I bet everyone here have a couple such skeletons in their hard drives. > In which direction? Frankly, I don't know. I haven't consider how a guilty person would have covered their tracks before hand. I just figured most people would just panic and search for various way of covering their asses, regardless of their guilt. --- My point was more, while most people would see guilty-looking behaviour as strong evidence of guilt, it is not necessarily so. And in this particular case, I don't think it is.