4 ms·
Perhaps, but this way no one has to go on the record stating that they're in favor of repealing the rule that financial advisors have to act as fiduciaries. Of
by st3v3r 10y ago
Perhaps, but this way no one has to go on the record stating that they're in favor of repealing the rule that financial advisors have to act as fiduciaries.
Of course, one would also think that no one would want to go on record voting to repeal a regulation designed to stop miners from dumping their stuff in our water, but apparently one would be wrong.
- toyg 10y agoOr going on record that the mentally ill should be armed. I honestly don't know how one can explain that sort of thing to his electorate, but clearly one can.
- sverige 10y agoWhat does the rescission of the Social Security rule against gun ownership have to do with this EO?
- toyg 10y agoIt's in the same category of "insane choices voted-in by duly-elected representatives that will somehow still manage to persuade the electorate to vote against their own common sense".