3 ms·
Well tough shit. You don't get to decide what's relevant once you're served. He's not a dumb guy. If he was aware of the notice then his actions are 100% suspic
by EpicEng 10y ago
Well tough shit. You don't get to decide what's relevant once you're served. He's not a dumb guy. If he was aware of the notice then his actions are 100% suspicious.
- Retric 10y agoThat's not actually how things operate. Now, it is best to set aside a relevant machine or HDD etc. But, for example if you buy a new phone and then brows the web on it, then as a basic fact of browsing the web cache files get deleted. So, if you get such an order. Box up your current machine. Buy a new one, wipe it clean, reinstall from version control that's in no way suspicious. Assuming such things where documented and normal procedure. PS: I would add, the court of public option may ignore such things. But, the court of law is actually far from stupid.
- EpicEng 10y agoIf he had done either of those two things I found this anyone would have found it suspicious. Of course, he didn't, so what's your point?