4 ms·

I think you read that backwards (not at all surprisingly): It's not the case that Walmart can't give Amazon hard times. Therefore, it is the case that Walmart c

• bonzini 10y ago
  That's how you have to read it, yes, but it doesn't match the anecdote that follows.
• banku_brougham 10y ago
  > "I don't think Walmart isn't capable of giving Amazon any hard times" Actually, thinking Walmart is capable does not follow from not thinking they aren't capable. The subject doesn't think they are incapable of giving any hard times. Overall this is perhaps the weakest vote of confidence in Walmart possible, I would read this: "There exists the possibility that Walmart is capable of giving Amazon one or more hard times." That's the best I can do. edit: On reflection the word 'thinking' is crucial, because is suggests a level of uncertainty. Without that uncertainty: !(not walmart is not capable) <-> walmart is capable.