3 ms·
Yep. 100% agree. I think you have to treat Go as a dynamically typed system with some static typing thrown in, if you want to use it beyond its core use case.
by christophilus 10y ago
Yep. 100% agree. I think you have to treat Go as a dynamically typed system with some static typing thrown in, if you want to use it beyond its core use case.
- dgellow 10y agoYes! Thank you for saying this. If you think of go as a typed (and modern) Bash (the language, not the shell) everything makes sense :)