2 ms·
> Zenimax just had to prove that it was more likely than not code had been copied. Isn't the standard in the US that one must "prove beyond a reasonable doubt"
by graedus 10y ago
> Zenimax just had to prove that it was more likely than not code had been copied.
Isn't the standard in the US that one must "prove beyond a reasonable doubt", which seems like a higher standard than "more likely than not"?
- stock_toaster 10y ago"beyond a reasonable doubt" is only required in criminal cases. a "preponderance of evidence" is the requirement for civil cases.
- chris_wot 10y agoYup, and it's not a preponderance of evidence. As has been shown, it's quite possible the things they state are quite innocent.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]