5 ms·

Is there any level of evidence that could convince you?

• chris_wot 10y ago
  Dunno about him, but it would have to be a hell of a lot better than what they presented. They accuse Carmack of securely wiping evidence, so they had better present evidence that adequately proves it. And they haven't, so tough for them.
  • rayiner 10y ago
    Whether anyone wiped evidence was not a fact that Zenimax had to prove. That data was deleted from Carmack's hard drive after he received a litigation notice is simply a piece of evidence the jury considered alongside all the other evidence (including testimony about alternative explanations for why data was deleted). From that evidence, Zenimax just had to prove that it was more likely than not code had been copied.
    • graedus 10y ago
      > Zenimax just had to prove that it was more likely than not code had been copied. Isn't the standard in the US that one must "prove beyond a reasonable doubt", which seems like a higher standard than "more likely than not"?
      • stock_toaster 10y ago
        "beyond a reasonable doubt" is only required in criminal cases. a "preponderance of evidence" is the requirement for civil cases.
        • chris_wot 10y ago
          Yup, and it's not a preponderance of evidence. As has been shown, it's quite possible the things they state are quite innocent.
      • deleted 10y ago
        [deleted]
• jackmott 10y ago
  I don't even have an opinion at this point, I'm not educated enough on the case. Though I think the case is sort of fundamentally absurd, in that Zenimax made games, Carmack helped get their games working on a VR headset. Then left to make VR headset, which Zenimax didn't make. The whole premise is odd to me. I wouldn't really care if he did copy his own code.
  • qwertyuiop924 10y ago
    many of us wouldn't. In fact, this was my initial reaction. However, many (especially people within the industry, so most of HN) disagree, as does the US legal code.