3 ms·
I did not attack you or ignore you. I directly addressed one of your arguments and attempted to determine whether the other argument is your "true rejection" [1
by yummyfajitas 10y ago
I did not attack you or ignore you. I directly addressed one of your arguments and attempted to determine whether the other argument is your "true rejection" [1].
On the contrary, the only person ignoring the other's points and making anything close to an attack is you. You've accused me of being disrespectful, called me lazy and accused me of intentional misunderstanding, while simultaneously NOT addressing any of my core arguments.
Quite entertaining, I must admit.
[1] Specifically, I think even if that argument could be proven false, it would not change your conclusion at all. So bringing it up is merely a distraction. See also: http://lesswrong.com/lw/wj/is_that_your_true_rejection/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/wj/is_that_your_true_rejection/
- cynicalkane 10y agoThe question was if diversity is valuable in engineering. I gave a specific example of a specific kind of diversity that is valuable to engineering teams. If you're interested in Google's data, they make an excellent search engine that you can use to find that kind of stuff. I encourage you to do your own research, in part because I think I've done enough work leading you to the proverbial water.