4 ms·
Another dimension to consider in this is to be careful in how we demonize the Anti-Evolution people from this time in history as well. I do believe that William
by ideonexus 10y ago
Another dimension to consider in this is to be careful in how we demonize the Anti-Evolution people from this time in history as well. I do believe that William Jennings Bryan of the Scopes Monkey Trial was a very ignorant man in many regards, but the textbook he was protesting was horrifying in for they way it promoted eugenics. I wrote about this here after listening to a presentation from an anthropologist on the subject, who argued that Bryan--a liberal Christian--was strongly motivated by his opposition to eugenics:
http://ideonexus.com/2007/12/02/the-complex-william-jennings-bryan/ http://ideonexus.com/2007/12/02/the-complex-william-jennings...
In lessons learned from history, Jennings made the mistake of attacking the textbook on the validity of evolutionary theory instead of for the abhorrent promotion of eugenics. As a result, history remembers him as a buffoon rallying against a now-obvious scientific truth. I see a parallel today with many Climate Change denialists, who attack the science instead of attacking the policies being put forward using the science for support.
- humanrebar 10y ago> history remembers him as a buffoon rallying against a now-obvious scientific truth Well, some of that, but mostly he's remembered for being a powerful populist politician that delivered the "cross of gold" speech.