3 ms·
If the author wants credibility about bashing C# perhaps they should not generalize other languages within their argument. Can C# not stand on its own merits? A
by nawtacawp 10y ago
If the author wants credibility about bashing C# perhaps they should not generalize other languages within their argument. Can C# not stand on its own merits? As someone who has been using Python for nesrly two decades --How is the author defining 'hipster' languages?
- masklinn 10y agoApparently "hipster languages" are languages of which the author heard after C#, and "mature languages" are languages of which the author heard before C# (note that the list of "mature languages" is exactly identical to the list of "I have a background working with <languages>"). Makes no sense either way. But as far as I can tell little of TFA does, just some bloke claiming victimhood for their pet language.
- sametmax 10y agoWhat's more, Python is usually quite appreciated in the .Net community. It's a first class citizen on Azure, it used to have a .Net port (IronPython) and one of the current trending github project for C# is one allowing Python interoperability (https://github.com/trending/c%23 https://github.com/trending/c%23) It's like a grandpa getting angry alone in front of his mirror.
- denfromufa 10y agoI would say it is in both directions ;)
- draw_down 10y agoRight, it's "bashing" when people say things about C# the author doesn't like, but slagging off other languages as "hipster" apparently doesn't count as bashing.