9 ms·
The relevant court decision seems not to be about the topics about which Carmack writes: https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2017/02/oculus-execs-liable-for-500-mil
by acqq 10y ago
The relevant court decision seems not to be about the topics about which Carmack writes:
https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2017/02/oculus-execs-liable-for-500-million-in-zenimax-vr-trial/ https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2017/02/oculus-execs-liable-f...
"While the jury found that Oculus had not misappropriated trade secrets from ZeniMax—a major part of the case—it determined that Oculus co-founder Palmer Luckey had violated a non-disclosure agreement with the company when working on early prototypes of the Rift VR headset"
"Oculus is liable for $300 million in the verdict ($50 million for trademark infringement, $50 million for copyright infringement, and $200 million for breaking the NDA), while Luckey owes $50 million and former Oculus CEO Brendan Iribe owes $150 million (both for false designation). Oculus CTO John Carmack, who previously worked for ZeniMax and was accused of stealing code and destroying evidence, is not personally liable for any damages. ZeniMax had sought damages of $6 billion in the case."