3 ms·

There's the 2 for 1 rule, which Trump is trying to quietly sneak it through while everyone is distracted by immigration stuff. https://nypost.com/2017/01/30/tru

There's the 2 for 1 rule, which Trump is trying to quietly sneak it through while everyone is distracted by immigration stuff. https://nypost.com/2017/01/30/trump-executive-order-creates-2-for-1-rule-on-regulations/ https://nypost.com/2017/01/30/trump-executive-order-creates-... There's Trump's FDA shortlist - Balaji Srinavasan and Jim O'Neill: http://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/1/31/14364090/peter-thiel-fda-trump-silicon-valley-oneill-gulfo-srinivasan-gottlieb http://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/1/31/14364090/pet... These are both certainly far more based on Thiel's influence than Bannon's.

dragonwriter 10y ago
The first is just plain stupid, and the other seems actively harmful (though likely ideologically the same orientation as Bannon or Priebus would have recommended, if not the same individuals, so perhaps not actually a net negative), so I don't see any good that would be lost by them not being attached to Trump.
hackuser 10y ago
As someone else pointed out, the 2-for-1 rule has long been a GOP talking point.