11 ms·
Not sure if it's a sarcasm, but upvoted just in case if it is.
by huhtenberg 10y ago
Not sure if it's a sarcasm, but upvoted just in case if it is.
- lucb1e 10y agoThat's not sarcasm. It's not like anyone here has numbers to say I'm wrong, and I'm not hearing any good arguments as to why it's a bad idea. I've had my blog (which does 3 mysql queries for each pageload) hit the HN front page with 105KB/s uplink and either a Pentium 3 or Intel Atom as CPU (I forgot when I switched servers). In any case, something much like a Pi can handle HN front-page traffic with a database. And people are downvoting hosting a website that's even less heavy on a Pi? Unless it's 500 hits per second, I don't get it.
- toomanybeersies 10y agoWell connection reliability is an issue, for a start.
- rads 10y agoHigh availability is the standard these days and you don't get that with a single Raspberry Pi.