4 ms·
I'd rather the latter. Which is why I don't care that the private company that is the DNC was hacked. They don't succumb or respond to public pressure in any m
by sidlls 10y ago
I'd rather the latter. Which is why I don't care that the private company that is the DNC was hacked.
They don't succumb or respond to public pressure in any meaningful way.
- mattnewton 10y agoI think we should do more than treat it as a governmental organization, we should regulate it into behaving more like one, or regulate some of its influence away so that there's is more room for third parties
- sidlls 10y agoPlenty of states already have regulations. California has rules about how parties elect their boards and whatnot, for example, and officially recognizes parties. I agree that we should reduce their influence. That would be the opposite of doubling down on our current system of treating them like pseudo-branches of government. One way to accomplish that would be to ban official recognition of parties, require them to fund and run their own primary elections, and move to multi-member representation districts. All of these things can be done at the state level for state and local offices.