4 ms·
To further your point, the expert had to use Harry Potter as an analogy. In my opinion, analogies should be banned from courtrooms. They are fine for casual dis
by josu 10y ago
To further your point, the expert had to use Harry Potter as an analogy. In my opinion, analogies should be banned from courtrooms. They are fine for casual discussions, but they are often misleading.
- abraae 10y agoSlugulus Eructo!
- omegaham 10y agoI disagree, as precedent is hugely important in interpreting the law. You link the existing situation to precedent with analogy.
- erikbye 10y agohttps://www.theguardian.com/technology/1999/jun/23/microsoft.business https://www.theguardian.com/technology/1999/jun/23/microsoft...