3 ms·
> As was pointed out the last couple times this article was posted, this is an ad hominem fallacy. Not ad hominem - it was a "by the way..." in a private email
by lionhearted 16y ago
> As was pointed out the last couple times this article was posted, this is an ad hominem fallacy.
Not ad hominem - it was a "by the way..." in a private email after a long exchange explaining his motivations and position first. And I think it's a fair criticism - I believe in looking at the messenger as well as the message. It probably should be 95% message and 5% messenger, but you ought to take criticism a lot seriously from people who are out doing important stuff in your field, and slightly less seriously from people who never have.
So I wouldn't call it ad hominem. It is quite blunt, though. I don't know, I'm not normally a Steve Jobs fan, but I liked that quote myself.
- jraines 16y agoAd hominem doesn't mean "a public attack". It simply means arguing that a point is invalid/less valid because of who is making it. Or as Wikipedia says: "attempt to persuade which links the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise." -- in this case, the characteristic is "has not done something great in the eyes of Jobs".