4 ms·

I read it as "we will be adding features that make sense for VB (which might also make sense for C#), rather than keeping it in sync with C#". Allowing it to e

I read it as "we will be adding features that make sense for VB (which might also make sense for C#), rather than keeping it in sync with C#". Allowing it to evolve on it's own, rather than being C#'s ugly little brother.

flukus 10y ago
That risks libraries becoming incompatible. 99% of the top libraries are in c#.
- svick 10y ago
  That's explicitly called out in the article: they will make sure libraries written in new versions of C# can be used easily in new versions of VB.