> Beyond that, the Common Lisp package system doesn't cooperate the way you'd like it to I'm pretty sure that it is, and that generally in my package I would

> Beyond that, the Common Lisp package system doesn't cooperate the way you'd like it to I'm pretty sure that it is, and that generally in my package I would import bar from libraryA & foo from libraryB and not have to qualify the names. It's only in the case that both packages export a symbol with the same name that one is forced to disambiguate. I'd say that Lisp's package system is very close to perfect — it really does work well.