3 ms·
I'm not sure what they are going for with this statement. I really wonder who is the audience. I just don't know what good they were hoping to achieve. I'm n
by protomyth 10y ago
I'm not sure what they are going for with this statement. I really wonder who is the audience. I just don't know what good they were hoping to achieve. I'm not being cynical, I just don't understand.
Reaction wise this is basically signaling to most conservatives that Reuters hasn't been doing their job. Its a positive reinforcement that they didn't properly investigate or cover the scandals. I imagine #3 (Give up on hand-outs and worry less about official access) is going to generate most of the commentaries about what has been reported with the prior administration.
"Get out into the country..." was supposed to be your job. Maybe if they had done it properly a lot of surprising things wouldn't have been surprises.
- jeremywho 10y agoU.S. president calls journalists "among the most dishonest human beings on earth” or that his chief strategist dubs the media “the opposition party." I think their reason to respond is self-explanatory.
- protomyth 10y agoPrior administrations have had some amazingly unkind things to say about the press. I don't think those comments are any reason to respond.
- AnimalMuppet 10y agoFrom my memory, what Trump said is unprecedented. If you have contrary data, please share it.
- protomyth 10y agoPresident Obama as his comments on Fox News (he went farther and included comments on their viewers). For a bit of history, President Jackson was fairly salty with his views of newspapers. Unprecedented has pretty much been they insulted my guys instead of their guys.
- AnimalMuppet 10y agoLook, I'm not trying to argue with you, I just don't remember. What, specifically, did Obama say about Fox News? (I don't care about Jackson; I hope that civility has improved since then, though recent evidence casts doubt on that position.) Remember, the statement to beat is when Trump called journalists "among the most dishonest human beings on earth”.
- protomyth 10y agoPresident Obama was a bit more elegant but: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/obama-in-command-br-the-rolling-stone-interview-20100928 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/obama-in-command-b... http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/18/media/president-obama-fox-news-rush-limbaugh/ http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/18/media/president-obama-fox-ne...
- AnimalMuppet 10y agoSorry to disagree, but I don't see "Fox has a definite point of view" and "misinformation" as being comparable to "among the most dishonest human beings on earth". The first Obama quote says they're biased; the second Obama quote says they're lying; but the Trump quote attacks their character, not just their actions.
- protomyth 10y agoI see you cherry-picked the least problematic quotes: "If all you're doing is watching Fox News and listening to Rush Limbaugh and reading some of the blogs that are churning out a lot of misinformation on a regular basis, then it's very hard for you to think that you're going to vote for somebody who you've been told is taking the country in the wrong direction." "It's a point of view that I think is ultimately destructive for the long-term growth of a country that has a vibrant middle class and is competitive in the world. But as an economic enterprise, it's been wildly successful. And I suspect that if you ask Mr. Murdoch what his number-one concern is, it's that Fox is very successful." You might think there is a difference between "attacks their character, not just their actions", but a person's actions are their character. President Obama was more elegant but his behavior is no different.