4 ms·
Not just heavy but I really don't like all our processes named "java" with stupid -D cmd line parameters. A Nice native binary app will let you can name it what
by rb808 10y ago
Not just heavy but I really don't like all our processes named "java" with stupid -D cmd line parameters. A Nice native binary app will let you can name it what you want with config as you like it.
- jackmott 10y agothere are ahead of time compilers for java! not free though.
- AnimalMuppet 10y agoIIRC, gcj compiles to an executable.
- lisivka 10y agoGcj was deleted from GCC in October 2016[1]. So only free option left, AFAIK, is to use mono AOT[2]. [1]: http://tromey.com/blog/?p=911 http://tromey.com/blog/?p=911 [2]: http://www.mono-project.com/docs/about-mono/languages/java/ http://www.mono-project.com/docs/about-mono/languages/java/
- AnimalMuppet 10y agoOr a copy of GCC from September 2016. (That's not going to get you Java 9 support, I realize...)
- josefx 10y agoIt is not going to get you full Java 5 support either. The project was dead before the OpenJDK even existed and it never got better.
- zigzigzag 10y agoAvian can compile AOT to a single executable.
- voxic11 10y agoYou can name the process anything you like with exec -a
- evacchi 10y agoUse `jps`
- vacri 10y agoNot to mention that having three horizontal monitors still isn't wide enough to see the entire flag list in top/htop (looking at you, ELK stack)...