3 ms·
The company can do awful things. This is not a simple fact. It is a truth. > He made things into a me vs you situation No. They did. By not including the mir
by Mithaldu 10y ago
The company can do awful things.
This is not a simple fact. It is a truth.
> He made things into a me vs you situation
No. They did. By not including the mirror of that clause indemnifying him against them, the contract was the first to state "you could do awful things", so they have no standing whatsoever to complain about anything.
- dqv 10y agoHow many times do I have to repeat myself on this point? I'm not refuting that the company could do awful things. I'm explaining that if you're an ass hole to the person who can change it and make sure it stays changed for everyone in the future, it's not going to happen.
- Mithaldu 10y agoIf you restricted yourself to saying it is tactically unsound, and drop every other thing you're trying to say, i'd be able to join that position. Also note: If the company opens with an attack, and when called upon it doesn't apologize and fix, then that points to maaaaaaany other problems in the company and getting it fixed is a minor priority. It is in fact only a proxy towards figuring out if the company as it is, is deserving of any kind of trust. e: I'd also like to point you towards this: http://stimmyabby.tumblr.com/post/115216522824/sometimes-people-use-respect-to-mean-treating http://stimmyabby.tumblr.com/post/115216522824/sometimes-peo... "" Sometimes people use “respect” to mean “treating someone like a person” and sometimes they use “respect” to mean “treating someone like an authority” and sometimes people who are used to being treated like an authority say “if you won’t respect me I won’t respect you” and they mean “if you won’t treat me like an authority I won’t treat you like a person” and they think they’re being fair but they aren’t, and it’s not okay. ""