2 ms·
Hi, nice, this is a lot similar to our initial approach. Glad to see that! To make this flow a bit more easier, we've created a tool [1] (apologies for the plug
by rollulus 10y ago
Hi, nice, this is a lot similar to our initial approach. Glad to see that! To make this flow a bit more easier, we've created a tool [1] (apologies for the plug) that is on top of Helm. What it does, is taking a diff between a bunch of Chart references with values (the desired state) and what's currently in Kubernetes (the actual state), and perform a few create/updates/deletes. So for instance you don't have to add an explicit helm delete if you remove a component, instead just remove it from the desired state. In our day to day work we add and update tons of components through this system, only updating .yaml files, checking them into Git and have the CI/CD do all the work. Also our tool has a dry-run mode, which acts like a test stage for pull requests.
[1]: https://github.com/Eneco/landscaper https://github.com/Eneco/landscaper
- eicnix 10y agoHi rollulus, thanks for the info. As far as I understand it you configure the state of the helm release + configured values in a file and apply it to a kube cluster. Depending on your cluster setup this is really helpful. Do you have a solution for triggering a rolling update of pods if a configmap has changed? In your examples I didn't see any configmaps.
- rollulus 10y agoGood point, eicnix. No, we don't have a solution for that, but hadn't the need so far either. Sorry.