> You're not going to get the sort of fine-grained meta data that the semantic web expects. Like what? Articles was a bad choice of example for me to use, bec

> You're not going to get the sort of fine-grained meta data that the semantic web expects. Like what? Articles was a bad choice of example for me to use, because it's a common misconception that the Semantic Web is about making it easier to find documents. That's part of it, but (IMO) data about things is a lot more interesting than data about documents.