4 ms·
Django needs this kind of performance boost, without depending on gunicorn/uwsgi servers
by tuyguntn 10y ago
Django needs this kind of performance boost, without depending on gunicorn/uwsgi servers
- Notre1 10y agoWhy would you prefer to depend on this (Japronto), instead of Gunicorn or uWSGI?
- burnbabyburn 10y agoI don't thing for now those are comparable, uWsgi is a LOT more than what a 0.1 release is.
- xyzzy123 10y agoNothing will save django for free because if you used that your most likely real problem is scaling postgres or mysql. Use as many appservers as your customer base will pay you for. Basically, cry in your beer because you're so rich and successful now that the framework won't handle your stuff.
- scriptkiddy 10y agoAgreed. Scaling Django isn't difficult really. Just spin up another instance if you need to. The major problem is scaling the DB. Making sure you're not bogging Postgres down by making it have to deal with possible race conditions is difficult.
- est 10y agouWSGI has very decent HTTP/1.1 performance http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/HTTP.html http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/HTTP.html