2 ms·
That would only mean you can't use a patent to make the software non-free. It would be more convincing if you gave a clear example. (that wasn't functionally a
by davidgerard 10y ago
That would only mean you can't use a patent to make the software non-free.
It would be more convincing if you gave a clear example. (that wasn't functionally an attempted end-run around software freedom.)
- Nomentatus 10y agoIt would mean anyone willing to use that software can use your hardware invention without paying you. No thanks. You can dispute this I suppose because the wording of the license is awful and far too terse, and hasn't been tested in court - but for businesses, that IS the risk, and therefore the problem.