3 ms·
Linguistic relativity: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity > The principle of linguisti
by Swizec 10y ago
Linguistic relativity: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity
> The principle of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a language affects its speakers' world view or cognition. Popularly known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, or Whorfianism, the principle is often defined to include two versions. The strong version says that language determines thought, and that linguistic categories limit and determine cognitive categories, whereas the weak version says that linguistic categories and usage only influence thought and decisions.
> Currently, a balanced view of linguistic relativity is espoused by most linguists holding that language influences certain kinds of cognitive processes in non-trivial ways, but that other processes are better seen as arising from connectionist factors.
For a simple empirically shown example of linguistic relativity: you can see more colors if you have names for them.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/6thfloor/2012/09/04/its-not-easy-seeing-green/?referer= https://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/6thfloor/2012/09/04/its-not...
- riprowan 10y ago... and therefore, if you actually do see more colors (since you were given more names for them) then you're more likely to need a new name for the new color that you just saw that nobody has named yet, leading to even more color-names and even greater linguistically-enabled color vision among all your peers.
- andolanra 10y agoThere is a massive gulf between "having more color words makes you distinguish more colors", which can be motivated well using experiments, and "using the passive voice makes you lie more", which is a largely unmotivated and untrue personal prejudice.