> " I am referring to the context of a standard tournament where the loser is eliminated after losing their chips." Why would you refer to that? That's not at

> " I am referring to the context of a standard tournament where the loser is eliminated after losing their chips." Why would you refer to that? That's not at all what happened here. In the game that was played (long-term HUNL cash) the worst player cannot beat the best player at all. Not easily, not at all. Not to mention they didn't run the cards out. You're commenting without reading the article, seemingly.